Open Access

Estimated the radiation hazard indices and ingestion effective dose in wheat flour samples of Iraq markets

  • Ali Abid Abojassim1Email author,
  • Husain Hamad Al-Gazaly1 and
  • Suha Hade Kadhim1
International Journal of Food Contamination20141:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-014-0006-7

Received: 25 June 2014

Accepted: 31 October 2014

Published: 5 December 2014

Abstract

In this research, Uranium (238U), Thorium (232Th) and Potassium (40K) specific activity in (Bq/kg) were measured in (12) different types of wheat flours that are available in Iraqi markets. The gamma spectrometry method with a NaI(Tl) detector has been used for radiometric measurements. Also in this study we have calculated the radiation hazard indices (radium equivalent activity and internal hazard index) and Ingestion effective dose in all samples.

It is found that the specific activity in wheat flour samples were varied from (1.086 ± 0.0866) Bq/kg to (12.532 ± 2.026) Bq/kg, for238U, For 232Th From (0.126 ± 0.066) Bq/kg to (4.298 ± 0.388) Bq/kg and for 40K from (41.842 ± 5.875) Bq/kg to (264.729 ± 3.843) Bq/kg. Also, it is found that the of radium equivalent activity and internal hazard index in wheat flour samples ranged from (3.4031) Bq/kg to (35.1523) Bq/kg and from (0.0091) to (0.1219) respectively. But The range of summation of the Ingestion effective dose were varied from (0.0317) mSv/y to (0.5734) mSv/y. This study prove that the natural radioactivity, radiation hazard indices and Ingestion effective dose were lower than the safe.

Keywords

Wheat flourNatural radioactivityIraq market and gamma spectroscopy

Review

The world is naturally radioactive and approximately 82% of human-absorbed radiation doses, which are out of control, arise from natural sources such as cosmic, terrestrial, and exposure from inhalation or intake radiation sources. In recent years, several international studies have been carried out, which have reported different values regarding the effect of background radiation on human health.

Introduction

Natural radioactivity is caused by the presence of natural occurring radioactive matter (NORM) in the environment. Examples of natural radionuclides include isotopes of potassium (40K), uranium (238U and its decay series), and thorium (232Th and its decay series). In addition to being long-lived (in the order of 1010 years), these radionuclides are typically present in air, soil, and water in different amounts and levels of activity. Natural radionuclides are found in terrestrial and aquatic food chains, with subsequent transfer to humans through ingestion of food. As such, international efforts were brought together collaboratively to apply adequate procedures in investigating radionuclides in food (IAEA, International Atomic Energy Agency, Measurements of Radionuclides in Food and Environment [1989]), and to set essential guidelines to protect against high levels of internal exposure that may be caused by food consumption (ICRP [1996]; UNSCEAR [2000]).

Since wheat flour is one of the essential foods that is consumed in Iraqis daily lives, the desire to establish a national baseline of radioactivity exposure from different types of wheat flour samples that available in Iraq markets is very critical. Wheat flour is a powder made from the grinding of wheat used for human consumption. Wheat flour, the “Staff of Life”, has been an essential commodity to human existence through the centuries and is currently the most widely consumed staple food. Moreover, numerous studies were conducted worldwide to investigate natural radionuclides in food consumed in different parts of the world (Hosseini et al. [2006]; Jibiri & Okusanya [2008]; Ababneh et al. [2009]; Desimoni et al. [2009]). For a systematic treatment, a methodical approach is undertaken that focuses on a wheat flour type of food per study. Because wheat flour is popular among all ages, the current study focuses on investigating the natural radioactive content in all times of food.

Material and methods

Sample collection and preparation

Twelve samples of the most available types of flour were collected from the local markets in Iraq to measure natural activity. The types of samples are listed in Table 1. After collection, each flour sample was kept in a plastic bag and labeled according to its name. All of wheat flour samples were weighed and then dried in an oven at 105°C overnight and reweighed to find the water content. The samples were crushed and were made to pass through a 0.5-mm sieve. Sieved samples were weighed and a mass of 600 g of each sample was placed in a plastic container. The plastic containers were hermetically sealed with adhesive tape for 30 days for secular equilibrium to take place (Nasim et al. [2012]).
Table 1

Types and origin of wheat flour samples in this study

No.

Sample code

Name of Samples

Origin of samples

1

F1

Good sentences

Lebanon

2

F2

Fine semolina

Saudi Arabia

3

F3

Altunsa

Turkey

4

F4

Sirage

Turkey

5

F5

Barrash

Turkey

6

F6

Rehab

IRAQ

7

F7

Sankar

Turkey

8

F8

Super

Turkey

9

F9

Donya

Turkey

10

F10

Suphan

Turkey

11

F11

Farina

Turkey

12

F12

Sayf

Turkey

Measurement system

Natural radioactivity levels were measured using a gamma spectrometer which includes gamma multichannel analyzer equipped with NaI(Tl) detector of (3″ × 3″) crystal dimension as Figure 1. The gamma spectra were analyzed using the ORTEC Maestro-32 data acquisition and analysis system. An energy calibration for this detector is performed with a set of standard gamma ray 37000 Bq active 137Cs, 60Co,54Mn and 22Na sources from USNRC and State License Expert Quantities, “Gamma Source Set”, Model RSS- 8. The detector had coaxial closed-facing geometry with the following specifications: The calculated resolution is 7.9% for energy of 661.66 keV of 137Cs standard source. Relative efficiency at 1.33 MeV 60Co was 22% and at 1.274 MeV 22Na was 24%. The lowest limit of detection (LLD) for 238U, 232Th and 40K were 10.86 Bq/kg, 0.569 Bq/kg and 0.0261 Bq/kg respectively. The detector was shielded by a cylindrical lead shield in order to achieve the lowest background level. An energy calibration for this detector was performed with a set of standard γ-ray 37000 Bq active 137Cs, 60Co,54Mn, and 22Na sources. In this study, the activity concentration of 40K was determined directly from the peak areas at 1460 keV. The activity concentrations of 238U and 232Th were calculated assuming secular equilibrium with their decay products. The gamma transition lines of 214Bi (1765 keV) were used to calculate activity concentration of radioisotope in the 238U-series. The activity concentrations of radioisotope in the 232Th-series were determined using gamma transition lines of 208Tl (2614 keV). The counting time for each sample was at 18000 sec.
Figure 1

Block diagram of the equipment’s set up of NaI(Tl) detector.

Calculation of activity

Since the counting rate is proportional to the amount of the radioactivity in a sample, the Activity Concentration (Ac) which can be determined as a specific activity as the follows (Maduar & Junior [2007]):
A C = C B G ε o c M t I γ
(1)

Where Ac is the specific activity in (Bq/kg), C is the area under the photo peaks, ε% : Percentage of energy efficiency. Iɤ is the percentage of gamma-emission probability of the radionuclide under consideration, t is counting time in (Sec.), M is mass of sample in (kg) and BG is background.

Radium equivalent activity

Radium equivalent activity (Ra eq ) is used to assess the hazards associated with materials that contain 238U, 232Th and 40K in Bq/kg (Nasim et al. [2012]), which is, determined by assuming that 370 Bq/kg of 226Ra or 260 Bq/kg of 232Th or 4810 Bq/kg of 40K produce the same γ dose rate. The Ra eq of a sample in (Bq/kg) can be achieved using the following relation (Nasim et al. [2012]; Singh et al. [2005]; Yu et al. [1992]):
R a eq Bq / kg = A U + 1.43 x A T h + A k × 0.077
(2)

Internal hazard index

This hazard can be quantified by the internal hazard index (Hin) (Nasim et al. [2012]; El-Arabi [2007]; Quindos et al. [1987]). This is given by the following equation:
H in = A U / 185 + A T h / 259 + A K / 4810
(3)

The internal hazard index should also be less than one to provide safe levels of radon and its short-lived daughters for the respiratory organs of individuals living in the dwellings.

Ingestion effective dose

The Ingestion effective dose due to the intake of 238 U, 233Th and 40K in foods can be evaluated using the following expression: (ICRP [1995]; Janet Ayobami [2014]).
H T , r = i U i * C i , r * g T , r
(4)

where, i denotes a food group, the coefficients Ui and C i,r denote the consumption rate (kg/y) and activity concentration of the radionuclide r of interest (Bq/kg), respectively, and g T,r is the dose conversion coefficient for ingestion of radionuclide r (Sv/Bq) in tissue T. For adult members of the public, the recommended dose conversion coefficient gT,r for 40K, 226Ra(238U), and 232Th, are 6.2 × 10−9, 2.8 × 10−7 and 2.2 × 10−7 Sv/Bq respectively (IAEA [1996]).

The average consumption rate of wheat flour according to report of ministry of trade in Iraq for adults is 110 Kg/y (Source : The Iraqi Ministry of Trade).

Results and discussion

The specific activity due to 238U, 232Th and 40K in different kinds of wheat flour samples has been measured as shown in Table 2. The specific activity of 238U was found in the range of (1.086 ± 0.0866) Bq/kg to (12.532 ± 2.026)Bq/kg with an average (6.603 ± 3.715) Bq/kg, 232Th from (0.126 ± 0.066)Bq/kg to (4.298 ± 0.388)Bq/kg with an average (1.9465 ± 1.331)Bq/kg and 40K from (41.842 ± 5.875) Bq/kg to (264.729 ± 3.843)Bq/kg with an average (133.097 ± 67.044) Bq/kg.
Table 2

Specific activity of 238 U, 232 Th and 40 K in wheat flour samples

Sample Code

Specific activity in (Bq/Kg)

238U

232Th

40K

F1

1.086 ± 0.0866

3.411 ± 0.322

179.089 ± 3.187

F2

9.991 ± 1.715

3.340 ± 0.356

264.729 ± 3.843

F3

3.391 ± 2.241

0.796 ± 0.504

96.509 ± 2.446

F4

5.102 ± 1.861

2.462 ± 0.475

120.555 ± 5.5134

F5

2.243 ± 2.303

1.646 ± 0.394

47.805 ± 5.025

F6

6.599 ± 1.852

1.375 ± 0.655

100.892 ± 6.289

F7

11.078 ± 2.848

4.298 ± 0.388

79.767 ± 6.499

F8

BLD

0.126 ± 0.066

41.842 ± 5.875

F9

6.048 ± 1.526

1.561 ± 0.664

109.061 ± 6.643

F10

6.196 ± 3.127

1.652 ± 0.684

191.549 ± 7.006

F11

12.532 ± 2.026

2.685 ± 0.573

175.257 ± 6.510

F12

6.370 ± 2.307

BLD

190.104 ± 7.876

Average ± S.D

6.603 ± 3.715

1.9465 ± 1.331

133.097 ± 67.044

There is a variation in the specific activity of radionuclides in different wheat flour samples, for example (F1) which is Turkish Farina has lowest 238U concentration, while (F11) which is Lebanese Good sentences has the maximum value, (F8) Turkish Super has the lowest 232Th concentration while the maximum is (F7) also Turkish Sankar , and the lowest 40K concentration is (F8) which is Turkish Super and the maximum is (F2) Saudi Arabia Fine semolina. The results obtained show that the specific activity of 238U, 232Th and 40K in all wheat flour samples appeared lower than recommended limit of UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) [2008]).

The radiation hazard indices (radium equivalent activity and internal hazard indices) were calculated for all samples in this study as shown in Table 3).The radium equivalent activity internal hazard indices were varied from (3.4031) to (35.1523) with an average (19.6347 ± 9.1680) and from (0.0091) to (0.1219) with an average (0.0708 ± 0.0341) respectively.
Table 3

Radium equivalent activity and internal hazard index in wheat flour samples

Sample code

Raeq(Bq/kg)

Hin

F1

28.3442

0.1027

F2

35.1523

0.1219

F3

11.9621

0.0414

F4

17.9069

0.0621

F5

8.2789

0.0284

F6

16.3357

0.0619

F7

23.3670

0.0931

F8

3.4031

0.0091

F9

16.6801

0.0614

F10

23.3093

0.0797

F11

29.8681

0.1145

F12

21.0081

0.07395

Average ± S.D

19.6347 ± 9.1680

0.0708 ± 0.0341

The values of all the radiation hazard indices in this study (radium equivalent activity and internal hazard indices are lowest value in sample (F8) Turkish Super and the highest value in sample (F2) Saudi Arabia Fine semolina. This indicates that the internal hazard index in wheat flour samples were lower than the permissible limits of 1 recommended by UNSCEAR (UNSCEAR [2000]), while the radium equivalent activity also were lower than the maximum permissible level of 370 Bq/kg recommended by UNSCEAR (UNSCEAR [2000]).

Table 4 shows the results of the Ingestion effective dose in (mSv/y) for adult due to specific activity of 238U, 232Th and 40K in wheat flour samples which it is calculated using Eq. (4). The range of summation of the Ingestion effective dose were varied from (0.0317) mSv/y (at sample F8) to (0.5734) mSv/y (at sample F11) with an average (0.3213 ± 0.1657) mSv/y, but Figure 2 shows the compare between average of the Ingestion effective dose for 238U, 232Th and 40K in wheat flour samples which obtain the average of Ingestion effective dose due to 238U was higher than due to 232Th and 40K because of the increased the dose conversion coefficient for ingestion of radionuclide. This indicates that the Ingestion effective dose in all wheat flour samples were lower than the permissible limits of 1 mSv/y recommended by ICRP (ICRP [1996]).
Table 4

Ingestion effective dose for adult in wheat flour samples

Sample Code

Ingestion effective dose (mSv/y)

238U

232Th

40K

Sum

F1

0.0334

0.0863

0.1221

0.2419

F2

0.3077

0.0845

0.1805

0.5728

F3

0.1044

0.0201

0.0658

0.1904

F4

0.1571

0.0623

0.0822

0.3016

F5

0.0691

0.0416

0.0326

0.1433

F6

0.2032

0.0348

0.0688

0.3068

F7

0.3412

0.1087

0.0544

0.5043

F8

BLD

0.0032

0.0285

0.0317

F9

0.1863

0.0395

0.0743

0.3001

F10

0.1908

0.0418

0.1306

0.3633

F11

0.3859

0.0679

0.1195

0.5734

F12

0.1962

BLD

0.1297

0.3258

Average ± S.D

0.1978 ± 0.1066

0.0537 ± 0.0317

0.0908 ± 0.0457

0.3213 ± 0.1657

Figure 2

Ingestion effective dose in wheat flour samples.

Conclusion

The present study has presented the specific activity of radionuclides 238U, 232Th and 40K using gamma ray spectroscope in different type of wheat flour that are regularly consumed by adults age in Iraq. Specific activity concentrations of these radionuclides in samples were lower than as reported by UNSCEAR. Also the radium equivalent activity and internal hazard indices values obtained when compared with the world permissible values were found to be below the standards limit which due to be radiologically hazard safe. The high value of summation of Ingestion effective was less than 1 mSv/y, the limit recommended for the public (ICRP [1996]), hence wheat flour samples in Iraq markets products are safe to consumers.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

I would like to knowledge all those contributed in declaring this issue. Special thanks to the staff of the department of physics at Kufa University.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Physics, Kufa University, Faculty of Science

References

  1. Ababneh ZQ, Alyassin AM, Aljarrah KM, Ababneh AM: Measurement of natural and artificial radioactivity in powdered milk consumed in Jordan and estimates of the corresponding annual effective dose. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2009, 138: 278–283. 10.1093/rpd/ncp260View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Desimoni J, Sives F, Errico L, Mastrantonio G, Taylor MA: Activity levels of gamma-emitters in Argentinean cow milk. J Food Compos Anal 2009, 22: 250–253. 10.1016/j.jfca.2008.10.024View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. El-Arabi A: 226 Ra, 232 Th and 40 K concentrations in igneous rocks from eastern desert, Egypt and its radiological implication. Radiation Measurement 2007, 42: 94–100. 10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.06.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hosseini T, Fathivand AA, Abbasisiar , Karimi M, Barati H: Assessment of annual effective dose from U-238 and Ra-226 due to consumption of foodstuffs by inhabitants of Tehran city, Iran. Radiat Prot Dosim 2006, 121: 330–332. 10.1093/rpd/ncl030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. International Atomic Energy Agency, International Basic Safety Standard for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources. Series No. 115, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna; 1996.Google Scholar
  6. IAEA, International Atomic Energy Agency (1989) Measurement of Radionuclides in Food and the Environment. Technical Report Series No. 295, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  7. ICRP (1995) Age-dependent Doses to the Members of the Public from Intake of Radionuclides - Part 5 Compilation of Ingestion and Inhalation Coefficients. ICRP Publication 72. Annex ICRP 26 (1)Google Scholar
  8. International Commission on Radiological Protection, Age-Dependent Doses to Members of the Public from Intake of Radionuclides: Part 5 Compilations of In-gestion and Inhalation Dose Coefficients (ICRP Publica-tion 72)”. Pergamon Press, Oxford; 1996.Google Scholar
  9. Janet Ayobami A: Estimation of Annual Effective Dose Due to Ingestion of Natural Radionuclides in Cattle in Tin Mining Area of Jos Plateau, Nigeria. Nat Sci 2014, 6: 255–261.Google Scholar
  10. Jibiri NN, Okusanya AA: Radionuclide contents in food products from domestic and imported sources in Nigeria. J Radiol Prot 2008, 28: 405–413. 10.1088/0952-4746/28/3/N02View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Maduar M, Junior P: Gamma Spectrometry In the Determination of Radionuclides Comprised In Radioactivity Series, International Nuclear Atlantic Conference-INC. Santos SP, Brazil; 2007.Google Scholar
  12. Nasim A, Sabiha J, Tufail M: Enhancement of natural radioactivity in fertilized soil of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Environ SciPollut Res 2012, 19: 3327–3338. 10.1007/s11356-012-0850-zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Quindos L, Fernandez P, Soto J: Building materials as source of exposure in houses. In Indoor Air 87. Edited by: Seifert B, Esdorn H. Institute of Water, Soil and Air Hygiene, Berlin; 1987:365.Google Scholar
  14. Singh S, Rani A, Mahajan R: 226 Ra, 232 Th and 40  K analysis in soil samples from some areas of Punjab and Himachal Pradesh, India using gamma ray spectrometry. Radiation Measurement 2005, 39: 431–439. 10.1016/j.radmeas.2004.09.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Report to the General Assembly. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, New York; 2008.Google Scholar
  16. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation Effects of Atomic Radiation. Report to the General Assembly with annexes. United Nations, New York; 2000.Google Scholar
  17. Yu K, Guan Z, Stoks M, Young E: The assessment of natural radiation dose committed to the Hong Kong people. J Environ Radioact 1992, 17: 31–48. 10.1016/0265-931X(92)90033-PView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Abojassim et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.